Skip to main content

Logo for Midterm Review of the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (MTR SF)

  • High-Level Meeting
  • Risk Reduction Hub
  • Reports
  • Inputs
  • Recordings and agenda
  •  Search
Menu

A Review of Gender and the Sendai Framework

Source
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR)

This publication reviews the strengths and gaps of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 in relation to women, gender equality and disaster risk reduction (DRR). It is part of a series of thematic reports that were produced to inform the Midterm Review of the Sendai Framework.

The Review of Gender and the Sendai Framework, which is addressed to countries and stakeholders in the field of DRR, highlights that gender is a fundamental part of the social organization in all societies and that gender inequality is a key driver of disaster risk, requiring greater attention and more focused action and resources than have been directed to this issue during the first seven years of the Sendai Framework implementation. It also outlines how, despite some shortcomings, the Sendai Framework provides an ample mandate for governments, the United Nations and other stakeholders to pursue gender-responsive DRR as part of the core business of building resilience.

Download

A Review of Gender and the Sendai Framework PDF, 1.2 MB English

Last checked: 9 May 2023

Editors' recommendations

  • Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030
  • Policy brief: Gender-responsive disaster risk reduction
  • Towards gender equality and women’s leadership for resilience to disaster risks in Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Beyond vulnerability to gender equality and women’s empowerment and leadership in disaster risk reduction: Critical actions for the United Nations System

Explore further

Themes Gender Governance
Cover
Number of pages
20 p.
Publication year
2023

Also featured on

PreventionWeb
UNDRR Website

Is this page useful?

Yes No
Report an issue on this page

Thank you. If you have 2 minutes, we would benefit from additional feedback (link opens in a new window).